who dedicate their lives to science ministry, his name after
death will remain immortal.

None of us are not born immortal, and if a
what would have happened had he not been so lucky, as many
it may seem.

all that moving to make us the impression
salary for one if it objectively exists or not. Man
death, he objectively kidney, but when we feel the effects of
his personality, works, thoughts, then he is. . . I
I lived elsewhere outside the self, regardless of the flesh, and
I live now, live later, while my work will do
impression. Since I do most of your life and immortality.

Immortality, if we believe it would have been, it would be
been able to save us from thinking about one\'s physical existence
finality. We had thought that, even though our souls
their ground running in matter of physics and the law
captivity, they will go from the land of eternity in the world, over and above
destruction of the world. . . . But it is impossible to believe without
the assumption that man is composed of two parts, soul and
body, which can be detached and exist independently of each
the other. Unfortunately, the facts but denies it.

There is no reason to believe that Aristotle believed the individual
immortality, the view corresponding to Plato\'s doctrine, but
later - Christianity. He only believed in people
in so far as they are intelligent beings, faced with the
divine, which is immortal. People have to
possible increase in their divine nature, and to strive for -
the highest moral obligation. But if a man
implement it fully, he would cease to exist as a concrete
individual. It is possible that this is not the only possible
Aristotle\'s idea of ​​interpretation, but it seems to me -
most appropriate.

Immortality is understood as follows: a person participates in immortality the process of creation, that is, art, religion, morality - any kind of beautiful and good creation.

Immortality gives work to something eternal.

Immortal

immortality traveling with little luggage.

dogmats immortality of the soul - it is the same and mierinošākā
at the same time, the very idea of ​​self-restrictive one possible
the human mind is able to tolerate.