man who enjoys a good lunch or strikes the block of marble statues, matter sees disasters rather than hostile, but likely. Ascetic, In contrast, denies all the material pleasures in seeing their own material, I part from which he wants to break. This denial is attributed not only to so-called sensual pleasures, but also to the art world as beautiful is related to the senses. This kind of morality - the re

Once we ourselves give up its mind and support our views with authority, they get many difficulties. It is a reputation to build on? The Old Testament? New Testament? Koran? In practice people choose those texts that are considered sacred in the part of the society in which they were born, their choice of pieces that are pleasing to them, ignoring uncomfortable.

a great ability to reach so it is, who see their paucity.

Today, those who follow Marx\'s views on the economic history determinētību, do not trust. It is a dogma, which has been created on behalf of science. It reminds me very positivist dogma that the science will result in account. As is well known Auguste Account maintained that his doctrine of the nineteenth century, dominate the world. But in fact, towards the end of the nineteenth century, died last one they advocate.

We live in a double morality: one preach, but in practice without the use of a second application, but only very rarely preach.

Spinoza, who was one of the brightest people, and has lived according to his wisdom, the people were given advice to look at what is happening from an eternal perspective. Those who will be able to learn, feel that the present intolerable becomes much more paciešamāka.

If we will discuss certain accidents, then come to the conclusion that they could be divided into three categories. They are, first, the accidents related to our physical existence as death, pain. . . . Will name them as natural disasters. Second, as a separate category, we can classify the accidents that occur in our character or lack of bias, ie, ignorance, cowardice or over-abundance of passion. List the nature of the disaster. The third, which arises from a single individual or groups of power over other people here, not only quantifiable apparent tyranny, but also free of any interference in the development process. . . . They can be categorized as public calamities. Separate social systems can be assessed by how it treats each of these groups of adversity.

Nevairies of temptations. By the time they themselves will shy away from You.

Our fear of the disaster only adds to its possibility.

For a man to be happy, is not only pleasure in diversity, but also hope, an activity that gives meaning to life and change.

There is no reason to believe that Aristotle believed in the immortality of the individual, the view corresponding to Plato\'s teachings, but later - Christianity. He only took the view that people in so far as they are intelligent beings, faced with the divine, which is immortal. A person can increase his divine nature, and to strive for - the highest moral obligation. But if a man do this fully, he would cease to exist as a specific individual. It is possible that this is not the only possible interpretation of Aristotle\'s thought, but I think - most appropriate.

believe the hypothesis is not recommended when there are insufficient grounds to believe that it is correct.

concept is there that the whole human race is fighting with the chaos on the outside and dark inside, with a small spark of intelligence is gradually becoming a source of light, which dissipates the darkness. Against racial, tribal nations, and segregation is treated as nonsense, diverting our attention from the fight with Chaos and Eternal Darkness, wrestling, in its essence is the only truly human activity.

Democratic machine fools have the right to vote, in case of dictatorship - rule.